Date: 21 November 2024
Time: 2pm – 3.30pm (GMT)
Place: Online
Abstract:
This webinar will focus on the themes and issues in Part II of The Ethics of Researching the Far Right: Positionality, standpoint, and intersectionality, most notably on how the positionality and standpoint of researchers can impact not only on the field but on wider society. Challenging some positivist approaches which have placed the researcher above their research, as if social sciences could be conducted in the same manner as hard sciences, the authors presenting here argue that our striving for conducting impartial research must start with a clear engagement with our own positionality but also take into account the wider state of play and norms which may invisibilise certain patterns and structures of oppression, including racism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, and ablism, as well as the intersection between them. This is also important to understanding why we need to challenge more recent and progressive interventions which focus on researcher risk, but treat the researcher not as objective and outside the research, but instead as a universal subject and potentially equally vulnerable in the fact of the far right and institutions of power. The contributions will look at and reflect on these issues in relation to the politics of the field, research methods and, crucially, their identities and experiences as researchers.
Video:
Speakers:
- Rae Jereza (FrameWorks) co-author of Ethnographic empathy and research ethics as methodological whiteness
- Elsa Bengtsson Meuller (Southampton), author of Emotions in methodology: resisting violent ideological structures in the knowledge-production of extremisms
- Imo Kaufman (Nottingham), author of Safety and silence: oral history, far right research and the paradox of the ‘vocal minority’
Sign up to receive invitations for this webinar series: